TIMPM Logo

Skip to content
  • Home
  • Performance Measurement For TIM Programs
    • Introduction
    • TIM Performance Measures
      • National TIM PMs
      • Other PMs
    • Context
      • Incident or Injury Severity
      • Roadway Type
      • Vehicle Type(s)
      • TIM Performance by DOT Notification of Incidents
      • Other Incident Characteristics
    • Data Sources
      • TMC
      • Freeway Service Patrol
      • Law Enforcement
    • Challenges
    • Reporting
    • Data Mining
    • Legal and Institutional Issues
    • Agency Case Studies
      • Arizona
      • Florida
      • Kentucky
      • Las Vegas, Nevada
      • Michigan
      • Minnesota
      • Missouri
      • New Jersey
      • New York
      • Oregon
      • Tennessee
      • Virginia
      • Washington State
      • Wisconsin
    • Key Points for TIM Program Success
  • Model Database
    • Introduction
    • Terminology
    • Schema
    • Creation of Database
      • Data Dictionary
      • Data Requirements
      • Populating the Database
    • Analysis
    • Querying
    • Example Organizational Objectives
      • Improve TIM Performance for Freeway Incidents
      • Identify Improved Roadway Clearance Strategies
      • Reduce Incident Clearance Times
      • Reduce Secondary Crashes
  • Next Steps
  • References
  • Downloads
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Performance Measurement for Traffic Incident Management Programs

Performance Measurement for Traffic Incident Management Programs

Introduction

Traffic Incident Management Performance Measures

Putting TIM Performance Measures Into Context To Add Value

Data Sources For TIM Performance Measurement

Challenges Associated With TIM Performance Measurement Data

Reporting

Data Mining TIM Performance Measures

Effects of Legal and Institutional Issues on TIM Performance Measures

Guidance Interviews

Key Points

    Previous Next

Prepared for NCHRP
Prepared by Applied Engineering Management Corp. and Texas A&M Transportation Institute